The AI Safety Menu

All laws

2023 pause letter

The 2023 pause letter. Pause training of systems more powerful than GPT-4 for at least six months, everywhere, verifiably.

Cuts lead by~7 weeksof America's lead over China, over 3 years
Cuts p(doom) by~0.2%from a 5% starting estimate
Holds up● Training● Lab's own use● Public release
Enact it on the menuSee the findings

What it does

The 2023 open letter asking every AI lab to stop training systems more powerful than GPT-4 for at least six months.

Applies to: All labs training systems more powerful than the frontier.

What's in it: U.S. 6-month pause

Where things stand

Signed by more than 31,000 people including Yoshua Bengio, Stuart Russell, Elon Musk and Steve Wozniak. No lab paused.

Why it costs ~7 weeks

Six months without large training runs. Research continues and labs partly catch up after the pause, so a year later America is about a month and a half behind where it would have been.

Biggest unknown: Whether the pause would have been universal, which was the letter's own condition.

Why it lowers p(doom) by ~0.2%

The 2023 open letter: a six-month pause so safety can catch up.

The strongest case that it costs more

The letter's own condition was that the pause include all key actors. As written, it is not a unilateral policy and its lead cost under its own terms is zero. As it would have been implemented, it was unilateral. The menu prices the implementable version.

The debate

For

Against

Sources

Rough starting points, not precise forecasts. Lead costs assume China doesn't depend on U.S. models, the case least favorable to safety laws, and count 3 years. On the menu you can change every assumption and put in your own numbers. Last priced 2026-09-26.