The AI Safety Menu

All laws

Fund U.S. open models

Federal push for U.S. open-weight models. The government funds and promotes open-weight American models so the world builds on U.S. technology.

Grows lead by~9 daysof America's lead over China, over 3 years
Raises p(doom) by~0.15%from a 5% starting estimate
Holds up○ Training○ Lab's own use○ Public release
Enact it on the menuSee the findings

What it does

The government would fund, compute-subsidize or otherwise favor American open-weight models so U.S. models, not Chinese ones like DeepSeek or Qwen, become the world's default. Anyone, including rivals, could download and modify the strongest U.S. open models.

Applies to: Federal research funding and procurement.

Where things stand

U.S. open models exist (Ai2 OLMo, OpenAI gpt-oss, others) but Chinese labs lead open-weight releases. Federal support is small grants and DOE science models, not a frontier-scale open lab.

Why it gains ~9 days

Open models speed U.S. research a little. They also hand the same models to China, which matters if China depends on U.S. models.

Biggest unknown: Whether U.S. open frontier weights help America more (global adoption, research) than they help China and bad actors (free capabilities, no recall).

Why it raises p(doom) by ~0.15%

Not a safety law. Funds and promotes American AI models that anyone can download.

Once weights are public, safeguards can be stripped out and anyone can use them. Open models also help safety research, so this is debated.

The strongest case that it costs more

Supporters argue open American models set global standards and keep the world from building on Chinese open models.

The debate

For

Against

Sources

Rough starting points, not precise forecasts. Lead costs assume China doesn't depend on U.S. models, the case least favorable to safety laws, and count 3 years. On the menu you can change every assumption and put in your own numbers. Last priced 2026-09-26.